Time to be a coward

October 27, 2011

What happens when you trip over yourself one too many times? Get the ban stick out!

It’s funny that Tobold denies deleting my comment in that thread, yet despite seeing the follow-up comment I made here (not deleted yet), he stayed quiet. Strange huh? Not like this is the same guy who disabled comments because of his thin skin in the past, or has gone on crazy censorship sprees when the mood strikes. Nope, totally different guy.

Good times. Off to pick up that 8,000,000 vanity item for my spreadsheet sim.


Play to (profitably) crush: Round 2?

August 30, 2011

 Massively has a nice two-part interview (linking not working atm…) with two original Shadowbane, and now Wizard101, devs that is well worth reading.

The story behind Shadowbane is a familiar one. New devs biting off more than they can chew, having more ideas than time to code them, and ultimately a lack of funds forcing a release and dooming the product. The final bit, about announcing the game too soon and getting people hyped too early (while also possibly allowing the game to get funding), is very interesting and really highlights how screwed up funding can be.

I played Shadowbane briefly during beta and at release, but it was basically unplayable on my machine at the time (5-10 FPS), and by the time my hardware was upgraded and the game was fixed up, I had moved on. But I played the game enough to see the good parts (city building, sieging), and it is telling that no major release since SB has attempted some of the things they had going.

It would also be fairly humorous if these guys took the money they made with Wizard101, a F2P kids game, and created Shadowbane 2. This time armed with all the lessons learned and a proper budget. One can wish.


Fantasy Football: Need a few players

August 18, 2011

We currently have 6 teams signed up for our 12 team league. Some quick math tells me I need 6 more people. Comment here (with a valid email) or shoot me an email if you are interested.


Recruit-a-Random

May 10, 2011

The Rift recruit-a-random program tops out at 3 sales.

If Aventurine had limited their plan to that, I’d have to give up not just the mansion, but also three of my four cars. It would have saved me from 2+ years of fabricating just how awesome DarkFall is, and preserved my blogger e-rep. Yo.

Another day, another sandbox > themepark example.

Use my link please, I really need the spark…err, flaming pony. To better instantly teleport me into a dungeon, of course. Plus if you use my link, every 30 minutes you can teleport to me in-game and gaze upon my awesomeness. That’s a pretty serious bargain IMO.


It’s 3v1, we got this!

June 3, 2010

Getting better at PvP in Darkfall is usually a rather costly process, but its one everyone who really wants to improve goes through. It’s easy to go out with a veteran group to PvP and get good results (you kill people), but most of the time you won’t really be learning what it takes to get better in small scale situations, as you are more or less being carried by those around you, or you’re group gets defeated and it might be difficult to identify what you specifically did wrong. The best, but most painful way to get better at PvP in Darkfall is to go out there and fight people, and while you won’t see much success initially, you will rapidly improve.

The learning process was in full effect last night for myself and my two buddies. We were coming back to a few mob camps that we had just been farming successfully for a couple hours when I heard another player moving about. As I rode closer I heard a mount spawn, indicating the player was most likely not a friendly target. Coming over a hill I spotted the player and he was indeed an enemy, so a quick decision was made to give chase. Even though this was a 3v1 situation, all three of us were in PvE gear sets that were very suboptimal for PvP, so perhaps the decision to chase was not a good one, but you play Darkfall to PvP after all, so ultimately why not? You can always replace gear, but you can’t replace a learning experience.

The terrain was such that the enemy had no straight escape path, and so despite his head start, we eventually were able to close the distance and engage. As I was the one closest to the enemy, my basic plan was to slow him down and stall him long enough for the others to catch up, but he was game and would not engage in a mounted fight for long. As he rode ahead of me I jumped off my mount and put enough arrows into his mount to get it very close to death (if I did not suck at archery it would have gone down), and due to his attempts to dodge my arrows another group member was now close enough to engage as well. He unfortunately made the mistake of getting off his horse too close to the enemy, and the guy was smart enough to quickly jump off his wounded mount and grab my ally’s full health one.  The delay however was long enough to allow my friend to fully bow down the fresh mount (unlike me he has good aim), and once on the ground we were able to catch up and fight it out.

The mount was downed near the top of a sand dune, and right behind the enemy a very powerful mob was prowling. As the enemy buffed up I arrived and started shooting some magic. Unfortunately I was using a slower-casting PvE staff, so my DPS was limited compared to my enemies, and as luck would have it the mob started casting at me rather than the enemy who was much closer. As the two focus fired me, my health dropped quickly and in a last ditch effort I spawned my mount, used the Rage ability, and tried to avoid death long enough for my friends to bring him down.

Along with the problem of my staff, our more magic-focused ally was in heavy armor for PvE, and so his best weapon was unavailable to him, and his back-up, archery, was also significantly impacted. This meant that the enemy was able to focus me without much worry for the others, and despite using Rage and dodging on a mount, he was able to not only bring me down, but then pull off a smart confusion/gank combo. He was low health now, but due to the lack of AoE magic or the ability to put heavy pressure on him, he was able to recover before engaging the others, and ultimately killing them as well long before I had time to ride back to the fight.

While on the surface it’s a bit embarrassing to lose a 3v1, it was certainly a great learning experience and brings us one step closer to really feeling comfortable in small-scale PvP situations. I’m still adjusting to my now more magic-focused character, while the others are still fairly new to many aspects of PvP such as mounted combat, keeping pressure on an opponent, and how to juggle being aggressive while keeping your own vitals high. It’s that meta-complexity however that really makes Darkfall PvP so enjoyable and such a huge rush. It would have felt great to bring down a veteran PvPer, even 3v1, and the defeat is just more motivation to improve our play.

Edit: Ugh first day fail, sorry!

When Chuck Norris gets pulled over, he lets the cop off with a warning.

(DarkFall-related post disclaimer/reminder. If you click the image link near the top-right of this page and buy a DarkFall account, I get paid 20% of the client cost. If you believe this taints my views and reporting on DarkFall, your opinion is wrong.)


Guild Wars: Some plus and minus observations

May 28, 2010

As Aria and I have been slowly (level 7 atm) making our way through Guild Wars NightFall, a few things jump out as talking point. I’m still having a good time overall with the game, Aria is 50/50 with it mostly due to the amount of travel vs combat/content, but I know until we hit level 20 we are not really seeing the ‘real’ GW.

One thing that currently does strike me as a little odd is the pacing of the outdoor areas. We have yet to really hit our stride and battle in an area that feels right. Either we are fighting mobs that we plow right over, or we are fighting things 3-4 levels above us and dying more often than not. The oddest part of it all is I don’t believe we are skipping ahead or going out of order, but rather that the jump in levels is a bit drastic between one side of a quest hub and the other. Again, my guess is once you hit level 20 this becomes a non-issue, but right now it’s noticeable. A level indicator on quests would be rather helpful in this regard IMO. Am I missing an option for this?

I can’t talk about how Aria’s Elementalist plays, but my Dervish is again both interesting and also at times annoying. I have a good selection of self-buffs to cast, which give both a benefit while they are running and then a secondary benefit when they end. This combo of benefits is interesting. It’s also annoying because the buffs only last 20-30 seconds, which means you end up recasting them before every single fight. With 3-4 buffs being used, that’s a good amount of click-and-wait time before you clear yet another group of mobs.

The interesting thing is that many of my special attacks also remove a self-buff when executed, meaning that not only do I deal the special attacks damage, but I also get the ending benefit of whatever self-buff is removed. The annoying thing is that you then re-cast buffs if what you are fighting is still alive after one round of ‘attack and remove buffs’. Overall I think I like the system, and certainly in tougher fights it’s nice to plan ahead and pull off combos as you need them, but it does make the Dervish a bit micro-heavy for common mobs.

Finally, while overall I like the hero system GW has going for it, it also feels a little lacking. I like it because it in essence gives you another character to level, assign skills, and equip gear with. As those are core values of any RPG, and I enjoy RPGs, I like heroes for those aspects. It’s always nice to have a sword drop, and despite the fact that my Dervish uses scythes, I still benefit from the sword because I can have my hero Koss the warrior use it. Plus without having to roll an alt I can get an idea for how a warrior plays and the type of abilities they get. As we pick up more heroes, this will only increase.

Another huge bonus is that Aria and I can field a full party of four just by bringing out our heroes. While this does remove a major aspect of an MMO, grouping with others, for us it works well because of how quickly we jump in and out of the game. I would not want this kind of option in my main MMO, but in a side game it’s great, and I believe GWs makes for an excellent side game (no monthly sub being a key factor). Being able to mix and match heroes based on your class and what you need/want is another nice perk.

The major downside with heroes in GW however is that they are too automated. Once you assign their skills and gear them up, they basically play themselves. This is great for run-of-the-mill mobs, but it either trivializes or leaves you feeling a little helpless against tougher mobs. If the heroes do too good a job, you end up feeling like the game is playing itself. If they don’t do enough, you end up wishing you had more control. Given how heavily instanced GW is, I’d think an interesting option would be to allow a party leader to slow down time, and in this slo-mo mode you can assign specific actions to a hero in an almost RTS/TBS control style. That could never work in a virtual world setting, but in a 1-4 man instance, why not?

Like I said initially though, I’m still very much into exploring more of GW and its different functions and systems, plus it’s saying something that the graphics still look great given the games age. I can see why it’s not really an MMO, but then I can see why it’s not really an MMO for a lot of good reasons. More to come as we get further in.


MMO: It’s not a game

May 27, 2010

First, it must be really fun to be this good at DarkFall. Quality stuff as always Umberto. Oh and don’t mind the creepy girl right at the beginning, this is an actual DF PvP vid of high quality.

Personal jealousy aside, today’s topic is in response to my last post proclaiming SW:TOR as DOA. What I was getting at is TOR sounds like it will be a terrible MMO, not that it will be a terrible game. Those are two very, very different things. I would no be at all surprised if TOR is a very enjoyable game, with good graphics, sound, gameplay, all of that. It’s just going to suck terribly as an MMO.

Consider this: if you got 40 hours of entertainment out of a game before you were ‘done’, would you be satisfied? If I’m talking about a single player game like Dragon Age, hell yes. If I’m talking about an MMO, I’m likely just getting out of the ‘noobie’ phase and getting myself settled.

Perhaps a better way of putting it is like this: how many single player games have you played for 100+ hours, let alone 500+? Now how many MMOs have you played 500+, or even 1000+? How many times have you loaded up a single player game just to farm one mob/area for a few hours? How many WEEKS have you spent in the same instance/zone/spawn camp in an MMO?

My point being, MMOs are very different from all other games in how people play them. In a single player game, I can start as a street beggar and save the world in 40 hours. In an MMO, I might finally be able to fight something other than a boar after 40 hours (and most likely, I’ve upgraded to an angry, evil, hairy, or giant boar). One is not more ‘right’ than the other, but it’s a totally different set of expectations.

People are drawn to an MMO for the permanence, the character growth, and the sense of ‘making progress’ as related to the world and others (even if ultimately that progress has as much lasting impact as a single player game: zero). None of this exists in a single player game, at least not on the scale it does in an MMO. That’s why killing boars for an hour in a single player game seems god-awful, while in an MMO its par for the course. It’s why a single player game needs to have a combat system that is accessible and entertaining for 40 hours, while an MMO combat system has to be interesting for 1000, even at the expense of it taking 40 or so hours to really ‘get’ it.

And no, you can’t have both. You can’t be saving the world every 40 hours AND get 1000+ hours of gameplay out of a title. It’s simply impossible to create that much content, and even if it WAS possible, it would not be all that much fun. I mean saving the world is epic once or twice, but after the tenth time? Here comes YASTWQ (Yet another save the world quest), and unless it has a ‘best in slot’ reward, I’m not doing it. And remember how easy to pick up and play that combat system was in the last single player game you played? How much fun are you having with it after the 500th hour? That sweet combo or neat trick is not nearly as sweet or neat after you have pulled it off for the 1000th time, and that’s EXACTLY what happens in an MMO.

Now it’s entirely possible SW:TOR is aiming for a different set of players than those who enjoy MMOs, and perhaps the whole point is to get you in for 40 hours and have you step away, only to come back once more (RMT fueled) content has been added. Maybe.

Problem is, since BioWare tagged the game as an MMO, it’s going to be covered by just about every single MMO blog, and those blogs are written by MMO players. We don’t take kindly to running out of content after 40 hours, no matter how much fun we had in that short initial timespan (well most of us, some will no doubt gush for a week or so about how SW:TOR is the new jesus, but a month later we will still be reading the follow-up ragequit post). This won’t stop SW:TOR from selling 1million+ copies, but hype alone can do that (WAR, AoC). What’s very likely to happen however is that after a month or so, the overall feeling towards SW:TOR is going to be rather negative, and not to give all of us too much credit, but I do believe blogs and forums DO influence potential customers enough to ultimately matter, and I think this, along with disappointing the MMO crowd, is what SW:TOR is going to be remembered for most.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 182 other followers