Analyzing the magic formula.

Reading Keen and Graev, an interesting topic was brought up about MMO difficulty and how perhaps WoW has set a standard for ‘easy’ gameplay. It’s a good read, and raises some interesting points.

While WoW certainly has set a standard for a ‘mass market’ megahit, I don’t think it represents the only way to go about making a successful MMO. Plenty of titles make money for their developer without having 9 million subscriptions, and I think time will show that plenty of titles will be huge failures trying to emulate the WoW formula, costing developers millions.

While it’s safe to assume the ‘mass market’ does indeed favor easy to play games (see WoW, the Wii, and countless other examples), the overall gaming community accepts a wide range of games.

EVE Online is perhaps the least user friendly MMO out, with a barrier of entry amazingly high, such that even seasoned MMO veterans are often unable to get over the hump and really dig in to enjoy it. For a new playing it’s very overwhelming in its complexity, and little is done to reduce this. In later stages, the game is very unforgiving, with the harsh life that is 0.0 space, the complexities of the virtual market, and the multitude of running scams. And yet EVE continues to grow years after release, without a single pay expansion and no shelf presence in stores. To me this is a clear indication that there IS a market for players who enjoy a little cutthroat complexity in their MMOs. Their might not be 9 million of them, but there is enough to keep a company like CCP going, and going strong at that.

Lineage, while not a huge success here, is a massive hit in the Asia market. Lineage might be the exact opposite of WoW, in how it handles leveling (it’s a MASSIVE grind), and how it handles PvP (being the key focus, unlike WoW where it’s an afterthought). Its success again shows that different formulas work, and can be successful.

An unlikely example is Auto Assault, a MMO failure that has recently closed its doors. Auto Assault tried something different, and that ended up not working out. However, since it was done on a relatively moderate budget, it did not cause a financial crisis for its developer netDevil, who is still developing games now. Had Auto Assault had a WoW-like budget, and still failed, it is very unlikely netDevil and NCsoft (the publisher) would have been able to recover as quickly as they did, and we would all be reading a Darren ‘I hate the industry’ post right now. (Get a new SUWT out already man!)

All of this brings me back to the original point; that just because WoW has shown that ‘easy’ is one possible success formula, it is not the ONLY way to make a great MMO. What the MMO world has shown is that you need to release a game with focus, one that sets a goal and follows through. If your ‘vision’ is a good one (say hi to Brad when you see him on the bus everyone), people will see it and follow, as long as you deliver a solid stable product. I would have used a word starting with ‘P’ and ending with ‘olish’, but that would just add fuel to the fire.

If your ‘vision’ is from some suit who glanced at WoW and said “make me that”, you might be in trouble, and if you have a huge budget behind that mistake, you might just drag down a whole slew of people with you.

About SynCaine

Former hardcore raider turned casual gamer.
This entry was posted in EVE Online, MMO design, World of Warcraft. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Analyzing the magic formula.

  1. Keen says:

    Well said. You did what I couldn’t quite figure out how – You combined it into one great sentence. “While WoW certainly has set a standard for a ‘mass market’ megahit, I don’t think it represents the only way to go about making a successful MMO.”.

    That’s definitely the approach I was going for when I said that dumbing down the gameplay and focusing on one path isn’t the only solution out there.

  2. darrenl says:

    …gah…I can’t stand the pressure when you ask for a show like that :)

    …and I don’t hate the industry, I just like looking at it sideways.

  3. syncaine says:

    Hey, if the show was not so entertaining, you would not have the pressure. Now man up and get recording. The people demand content! And it better be polished!

    I also just read Tipa’s post about the subject (after I wrote mine sadly) and Vanguard is a good example of a game that was not done right, the difficulty of it had little to do with it’s failure. If anything, the fact that it’s not a WoW clone was probably a large factor in the decision for SoE to pick it up and fix it up. Again VG will never have 9 million subs, but if they fix it up and release a trial, it could hit a comfortable 100-200k.

  4. Darren only hates because he doesn’t know how to love.

    Someone lied to him about cake, I think.

  5. Pingback: Shut Up We’re Talking #13 « The Ancient Gaming Noob

Comments are closed.