Gear sucks

Posted on April 20, 2011 by SynCaine

Permanent gear is a massive design flaw in an MMO. Keep that in mind while reading.

Inquisition on Sunrest has been running tier one experts for a bit now, and our general core is geared-up enough to start hitting up tier twos. So far we have completed Darkening Deeps, and had a marathon attempt at Charmers Caldera that ended in multiple wipes on the final boss.

The difficulty jump from normal dungeons to T1 experts was noticeable, but in a good way. The runs were a solid challenge, and the twists on familiar bosses were interesting. Overall the instances on expert feel like the ‘real’ version, with the normal version being somewhat of an extended sneak peak.

The jump from T1 to T2 was actually greater than I had expected. Not only are the bosses more finely tuned, but the trash can and will cause wipes, and careful pulling becomes a must. If the normal versions are a sneak peak, and the T1 version is the real deal, then T2 is what many would call hard mode.

At least, all of the above applies when you are running the instances at or near the expected power level. As soon as your power starts to creep above expectations, the instances get, well, dumber. Instead of careful pulls you AoE stuff, and instead of carefully planning for a boss, you eat half their abilities and just brute-force them down.

On the one hand, that increased feeling of power is a nice reflection of your characters progression, and when you are running the same instance for the 10th time, the speed-run approach is kinda nice. However, if this is all you are doing, I can’t imagine it being very fun long-term, and I think this is the trap a lot of players fall into.

If the minimum requirement is X, many players won’t attempt the instance until they are at power point Y, skipping the whole ‘at level’ experience and going straight to speed-runs. It’s pretty crazy that certain games even encourage such behavior, but then again the cult of the shiny has a wide following.

Going back to the first line of the post, all of this stems from the general problem of power creep, which is inevitable when you have permanent gear and an end-game that revolves around getting more of said gear. The only ‘fix’ is to release content fast enough that most players don’t fall into the rut of speed runs for too long.

A shortcut is to release super-hard (or impossible) content to stall the players, and then slowly nerf it down to a reasonable level. The other option is to just produce more content, but that has well-known limitations. Neither solution actually fixes the root issue of players becoming too powerful and killing the difficulty of an encounter, but at least it distracts us long enough not to really care.

Posted in Inquisition Clan, MMO design, Rant, Rift | 32 Comments

PvE Sandbox MMO: The End

Posted on April 19, 2011 by SynCaine

I believe I’ve covered the main areas I wanted to hit on in my PvE Sandbox series. There are a ton of other, smaller systems to consider and discuss, but to keep things somewhat high-level I’ll leave it as is. What I do want to write about today is more of a ‘day in the life’ type of post, both from a newer players perspective and what would be considered end-game, to hopefully give everyone a final view into what I believe something like this would look like.

The first and most important task any new player would set out to accomplish is getting established and learning the ropes. The first few days would be spent around a pre-set starter-area, located at a crossroads of the world (so advanced player traffic is visible, and so further options are available in all directions). This area would be hard-locked in terms of an established but limited town, and the local spawns would also be more static and weaker. The idea is to provide enough stability so fresh players can get started, but an area weak enough that the first major goal would be to leave to seek richer spots.

Once a character is not totally new, they would leave the starter area and decide whether to join up with an existing guild in their location, join an existing player-run town, or set out alone and attempt to get a smaller dwelling of their own. Day-to-day gameplay would consist of monster hunting (non-static and all that) and resource gathering, with perhaps some trade if an opportunity arises. Long-term the goal would be to both expand your character’s possibilities (I tend to favor a hard-cap skill-based system) and your current wealth. As both rise, different opportunities open up, be it a bigger house, higher trade skills, or a stronger contribution to group-based PvE.

‘End-game’ would still consist of monster hunting and other wealth-gaining activities, but would also include defending a town/house from PvE attacks, and fighting back against PvE strongholds or known lairs. The main content driver would be the continued struggle between the players and the mobs, with both sides always seeking to control more territory and establish bigger and better cities.

The world would have three factions; the players, the enemy NPC faction, and neutral mobs. Neutral mobs would not only be wildlife creatures like wolves and bears (with dens and reactive behavior to player actions), but things like goblin/orc tribes and such. Small factions that also attempt to establish settlements, but not part of one overarching force. They are the more daily consistent content or the small-scale conflict drivers. Potentially neutral mobs could fight the enemy faction. I’m a fan of AI on AI battles, just to watch how it plays out.

The enemy NPC faction would be a more unified force of (pick your lore) and their minions. This is where the AI would need to act most like a player, and this faction would always be looking to control larger sections of the world. The only ‘spawn points’ this faction would have is out of its established locations, all locations that the players could seek out and destroy. The further the faction gets pushed back, the stronger it gets (the reverse of what usually happens in a PvP sandbox, where the zerg gets bigger as it attracts more players).

Ultimately, if the faction gets pushed back far enough, a big-bad spawns, creating something of a world event. In reverse, if the world gets a little too overrun, a good guy hero spawns and starts an event. Both situations would normally be rare, but both could be triggered with some dev action (make the faction stronger/weaker, offer more rewards for attacking, etc).

So there it is, a PvE sandbox MMO. It’s been fun, and either I hit the lottery and make it, or someone with cash has a great unannounced project. Until then, I’ll be switching between my sociopath playground and my rainbow candyland.

Posted in MMO design, Random | 11 Comments

Rift: Grim Harvest world event was AWESOME!

Posted on April 18, 2011 by SynCaine

This is why I love world events. It’s not for the loot, it’s not for the lore, and it’s not for the gameplay.

No no.

It’s for the forum rage. And Rift delivered beyond anything short of League of Legends being unavailable for more than ten minutes in terms of pure, uncontrollable, fists-to-keyboard, rage-bucket-overflowing nerdrage. It’s like Trion went to every subscribers home and murdered their mothers/stole a hotpocket. It’s something akin to watching a preview for Bridalplasty, and thinking that this is now the new low for humanity.

The sheer amount of ‘me me me’ sentiment, the outrageous levels of entitlement, and the total hypocrisy of it all (We want truly dynamic content! No I missed the dynamic content, wtf is this /wrist!) just shows how truly sad a large section of any MMO community really is. If I was a dev, I’m not sure how I would handle it short of instancing everything on a repeating cycle… wait… nevermind.

That aside, let’s talk about the event itself. Simple put, phase 2 was good, phase 3 missed the mark, and overall expectations were WAY too high and the outcome either poorly communicated or simply underwhelming. Think WoW AQ40 gate event, only… actually think AQ40 event.

Phase 2 was good in that it spread the population out across all zones, was close enough to existing gameplay that it reduced confusion (it was basically a bigger invasion with more flavor), and on Sunrest it worked. MMO history has set some pretty damn low expectations for world events, but hey, it is what it is.

Phase 2 could have been better though. The whole thing was too quick, and should have contained more waves of attackers and perhaps some more ‘final’ bosses. Just something to give everyone enough time to make it over, and to perhaps give the whole thing a greater sense of actual danger. At least in Shimmersands, the invaders never even came close to winning. That said, whatever you do is going to get mega-zerged, so you are somewhat limited. If you make the bosses AoE people down, those playing on toasters are going to cry you a river that they died to lag and how that’s totally unfair and they feel like used cattle (or something along those lines, too many ridiculous forum posts floating around in my head to keep them all straight right now).

As for phase 3, I get what Trion was trying to do. It was a total fluff event, just some lore playing out in the world to set up the opening of the new raid instance. In that context what actually happened was pretty cool, as you got to see the two faction leaders face off with the big bad, and the ‘four pillar’ was all over the place. My lightsaber was quivering in excitement (btw, SW:sRPG is going to be amazing and everyone is going to love it, have I mentioned that?).

The problem was I think most people expected some epic boss showdown, followed by a massive loot-piñata explosion. Not so much on that front. Again, I think it was more of a communication issue than anything else; had people known phase 3 was just going to be some lore stuff, it probably would have worked out (the “I’m just here for the shiny” crowd would have stayed home).

Oh, and about that crowd. While Shimmersand in phase 2 was full of people in a good way, Stillmoor in phase 3 was a brilliant tech demo of the limitations of the Rift engine (not to mention the server crashing twice and the whole event having to be cycled in an odd, immersion-breaking fashion). With god knows how many people all in one area (literally 100s, if not over a thousand people in exactly one spot), the engine was only drawing 50 or so characters and limiting particles, which made walking around a ghost-show as people popped in/out on your screen. The worst part was my machine was happily chugging along at 30 FPS+, and could have easily handled more stuff on-screen (I was still at maxed out settings), but that option was not available to me. Add in being on a PvP server, and yea, not good. To Trion’s credit, at least the engine prioritized the special NPC characters, so even though I was not drawing the hundreds of players around them, I still got to see/hear the lore play out. Had THAT been cut due to player load, I might have a made a forum post myself (not really).

Without a doubt a lot of lessons learned here for Trion. They have already acknowledged that and tried to make amends with the nerdragers (btw, is it really an ‘achievement’ if the devs hand you the achievement?), and have stated that the next world event, which is coming shortly, will be better. If they can keep to a rapid pace, say one event every two months or so (more would be better, but every other months is pretty realistic IMO), people will get that if they miss something, it’s not a once-in-a-lifetime (AQ40) thing and they will get other opportunities to participate in an event.

That, or every other month will be a massive burst of entertainment on the forums. Something tells me it’s going to be a little (lot) of both.

Posted in MMO design, Rift | 26 Comments

Rift: Soul system working as intended

Posted on April 15, 2011 by SynCaine

Quick Rift observation for today, and next week I’ll wrap up the PvE Sandbox MMO series (which, btw, I think has gone really well, so thanks everyone for the feedback so far).

Last night we ran expert Iron Tombs again, which for me is now 6-8 runs, but this time we had a very different setup than our normal 5. Three rogues, a mage, and myself, a warrior. Our mage went Chloro (healer), we had a bard (healer), and two dps rogues with two different builds, both which could go bard if we needed more healing. Our normal group is warrior, warrior, cleric, rogue, mage/rogue.

While it was still the same instance, it felt different during the boss fights, and even trash was not identical. It was, honestly, pretty refreshing. Bosses that would give us trouble before went down easy, while the boss that we usually steamroll caused a wipe and a razor-thin second attempt victory.

Now granted, in other themeparks you can do something similar by bringing different classes, but Rift makes it much easier thanks to the soul system and how easy it is to switch up not just specs, but entire roles. Usually our mage goes dps, and if he was a mage in another themepark, odds are the best he could do would be to switch to a different flavor of dps. Not so in Rift, and this not only adds an enjoyable option for him, it allows our guild to combine more groups of 5 and still successfully complete an instance. Our guild roster, which is rogue heavy, would be a total disaster in WoW. In Rift, it’s perfectly fine and does not limit us in terms of content.

It sounds like just a ‘nice to have’, until you are faced with the fact that your rogue-heavy guild is forced to sit some people more than others based on their character creation choice. That crappy leader/officer decision is averted here, and to me that’s way more than a ‘nice to have’.

To tie this into the current blog-o-sphere hot topic (again) of cross-server matchmaking and the general issue of a tank/healer shortage, it’s nice that Rift makes this so easy. If I want to sit out from tanking, we can have a rogue step in, or a cleric. If our cleric wants to take the night off, in comes a mage or rogue. My warrior can dps, as can the cleric. It’s not “any class you can image”, that was stupid PR speak (and most of us knew that), but yea, it is a solid step up from locked-in DPS classes having three flavors of DPS, tanks that can only tank, and healers crippling the group if they don’t heal.

Class system 3.0.

Posted in Combat Systems, Inquisition Clan, MMO design, Rift | 15 Comments

The future looks so bright!

Posted on April 14, 2011 by SynCaine

Kinda sad when even your own fansites accept reality and just cave in.

Comment thread is off to a good start too. If you re-re-introduce NAX, do you hope it’s a 5 man, or go all out for an ‘epic’ solo quest?

Oh, and have you grouped with this gem lately?

Unlike the majority, I couldn’t care less if the content is “rehashed”. I notice less because I know about 1% of the lore. It bores me to tears. I don’t give a rat’s behind about Arthas or Illidan or whoever else those people are. I just want to kill stuff.

Fix the more important problems like Q times and painfully long instance runs.

I wonder if he plays DPS…

Posted in World of Warcraft | 17 Comments

Single Serving Friends

Posted on April 14, 2011 by SynCaine

I wasn’t going to make a post about this, but then the ancient relic known as Blogger ate yet another of my comments, and well, here we are. Tobold first had a post about how the cross-server dungeon finder is pure awesome for an MMO, and followed it up with how Rift is basically the same game in terms of community because people don’t have pleasant conversation when grouping to close a rift. Basically.

The cross-server thing has been covered, but just to quickly summarize; auto-queuing for a group activity and receiving increased anonymity is basically taking the GIFT and turning it up to 11. Add in other socially awesome changes like gearscore, solo-everything gameplay, and loot>all, and surprise, you turn people into complete trolls. If you don’t see the issue with that, well, I’m not sure what to say honestly. If anyone thinks WoW had the server community it has now back in 2004, god help you. And if you think that the decline in that community has nothing to do with Blizzard, you are beyond even god’s help.

Moving on, what DO people expect from social interaction in an MMO? If I told you that in my MMO of choice every random group starts and ends with a pleasant conversation, would you really see that as a plus? Because to me, those random conversations are about as awesome as a random conversation in an elevator with a stranger. “Yes, it is cold you. I know, crazy. Yup, Spring is coming soon. Have a good day” /end. If I never have that conversation again, +1, both in-game and out.

And really, public grouping in Rift simply removes the tedious step of /whisper invite, followed by /invite X. Are we really gutting social interaction with such a removal? Because if you want to have that pleasant conversation once you hit the Join button, you still can, and I’ll still respond curtly or ignore you based on how my day is going. Either way, I don’t feel I’ve lost some great social gem. We don’t need to have a conversation about how we are here to knock out this rift, or stop this invasion; it’s pretty damn obvious.

I did encounter what some would consider a gem last night, though this is somewhat common in Rift. It went like this; fly into Stillmoor, see someone putting together a raid to knock out a raid quest and farm some elite mobs in the area. Accompany the 19 other strangers to the start of the elite area, inform raid leader that I’m a tank, healers know to target me, and I start to chain pull like a madman. Healers keep me up, DPS knocks stuff down, progress is quick. We get to the raid boss, we gather everyone, quick strat overview, boss goes down, “good job everyone”, we stick around to continue farming the elites. Whenever someone goes down we rez them, people stick with the group, we don’t have randoms pulling, chasing resource nodes, or causing trouble. After about an hour or so we wrap up, everyone leaves the raid. I check my bag and have a few green items that I rolled greed on. Good times.

Feel free to share a similar experience you had in WoW in the last year. Wait what, you’re still in the queue? Hmmm. Oh and you roll ‘need’ on everything because it’s a PUG? Odd. And you are shocked that everyone did not split as soon as the main boss went down? Ok. Wait you don’t visit zones anymore, you’re at the cap? I see. But hey, um, you can random PUG dungeons easier now. That’s nice.

As for those pleasant conversations? I have those in vent with my guild, who are not strangers, who I do know something about, and who I do want to play with regularly. But them, I’m in a guild with people, not gearscores. I recommend you try it, it’s pretty cool, adds a lot to the MMO experience. Plus it really reduces our ‘queue’ time when running a dungeon, and we don’t get many ninja looters (not that anything but Cleric stuff drops anyway, F you Allerion). Which is not to say we have not gained guild members from random stuff on our server; we have. When people see gods-gift to tank (me, duh), they want to be a part of that.

Plus being in a guild with someone who is ‘kind of a big deal’ on the internet makes people feel better about themselves, and as I’m a fan of the little people, I let them tag along. I’m nice like that.

Posted in Inquisition Clan, MMO design, Rant, Rift, World of Warcraft | 26 Comments

PvE Sandbox MMO: Housing

Posted on April 13, 2011 by SynCaine

If combat and the economy are the two most important areas for a sandbox MMO, player housing is the most neglected. It says a lot about the genre as a whole when the very first MMO, Ultima Online, had and possibly still has the best player housing around. That really is a crime, especially given how important a hook housing can be to players and guilds alike, and just how much content they can drive.

Housing, both individual homes and cities, have to be set in the actual world, not hidden behind some instanced curtain or in a housing-only zone. Secondly, while you don’t need to make every last square inch of the world open for placement, it has to be far more than a few pre-determined plots. The over-development issue that UO faced should be solved not by hard limits, but by soft caps; an area can only have so many houses before it becomes ‘full’, and the closer to full an area gets, the more attention those buildings draw from mobs. The longer the players hold out, the harder the mobs try to overrun the players, eventually resulting in someone moving out or being pushed out. The more popular the area, the higher the risk.

As the only ‘griefing’ that can really occur is from mobs, housing should be destructible; if you can’t protect it, you shouldn’t own it. This prevents the “I got it first, I own it forever” real-estate rush, and gives newer players a chance to eventual own prime locations. The major difference here is that setting when a house is vulnerable (say a 2-3 hour window per day, or a total of 10 hours per week, whatever) won’t upset the mobs trying to destroy it; they will happily show up whether you set your time for primetime or server up/down, while it does allow home owners to actually defend what they own rather then lose it when they are not online, as is all too common in PvP sandboxes.

Housing should be varied, from small and affordable tents and cabins to sprawling mansions and castles, with house size meaning more than just a bigger physical footprint. Larger houses should have the option to hire NPC guards for protection, or to allow for faster crafting production. As this is a PvE game, house storage should be 100% secure from other players, while still being vulnerable to raids from mobs.

Certain houses would also serve as shops, with wares being displayed on the walls or in the windows (again, it’s sad that you could do something like this in UO, and as far as I’m aware, in no other MMO). The level of customization would allow an owner enough freedom to make their shop stand out, and with crafted gear allowing for fluff customization, this would be very important. Shops would be operated by a vendor NPC, creating the illusion of a seller without the requirement of the actual player having to stand around and wait for shoppers. That said, if the shop was active the owner would often see his customers looking around, again leading to natural socialization, as shoppers could make requests or provide feedback on what items they would like to see for sale.

Player cities would be a formal collection of houses, with additional perks such as city walls, guard patrols, public crafting areas, local banking, and a town message board or newspaper (that could automatically generate basic information about recent mob movement, attacks, or possibly new areas of resource wealth). This would all come at a high cost, one that would be collected and paid by a guild or the locals, and the creation of a city would also dramatically increase mob aggression for that area. Cities could still operate within the vulnerability system, but the requirements would be much higher (5-6 hours daily, 30 hours per week, etc), as the expectation would be that all city residents accept defensive responsibility and actually protect their city. A ghost town of a city won’t hold up to mob raids for long, and will either be destroyed or the owners will adapt and actually populate the area regularly.

Cities could also expand or contract based on player interest, rather then being hard-locked into a few set sizes. If a guild discovers a rich resource area, they may build up a city to help aid in gathering, with other non-guilded players joining in as well. Once the resources are tapped, they might move on and leave behind only those who wish to stay and continue operating out of the now less-than-ideal location, reducing the footprint and the mob threat level. As the worlds resources and mobs dynamically shift around based on player activity, no single spot would remain as the ‘best’ location for long, although one would expect certain areas to always be somewhat popular (central locations, near caves/dungeons, etc), leading to some stability.

All players should have the goal of owning property, and smaller houses in more remote areas should be easily obtainable for all but the newest players. As a players personal wealth progresses, he can either afford larger single houses, or become part of a city. At no point is a city ‘too big’ in terms of total houses, although the larger the city, the harder it becomes to defend. Great cities will be popular destinations due to all the shops and utilities (bigger cities could, for instance, have better scouts and hence more informative/accurate local reports, making finding a hunting spot or resources easier), yet also somewhat dangerous with tougher and more numerous mobs roaming the area or making a direct attack.

World events could focus on bringing down cities that have been around for ‘too long’, and the world’s natural story arc could at times focus around heroic groups of players holding on to their property for extraordinary lengths of time (think of it like an endless mode in a tower defense game, but MMO style). As with items themselves, players would understand that houses are not permanent items, and hence their loss would not be game over situation. That said, destruction should not be too frequent, to both provide some stability and also increase player attachment to a location. The final defeat in a city that has stood for months would hurt, but it would also make for a grand event in the world’s history. This would also be the case, although on a much smaller scale, for individual houses, though if even somewhat remote, those houses could be held indefinitely by vigilant players.

The major goal however is to make housing the major driver of content in the world. House density influences mob activity, the acquisition and defense of a house is always a major player goal, and the natural shifting of player house locations creates a more dynamic world.

Posted in crafting, Housing, MMO design, Random, Ultima Online | 21 Comments

PvE Sandbox MMO: Economy and crafting

Posted on April 12, 2011 by SynCaine

After combat, I believe the economy is the most important aspect to a quality sandbox title, and not just for those hoping to play a merchant. The ideal system would impact everyone playing on a regular basis rather than being a side-show for the few who decided to focus on crafting. Equally important, the system should be self-regulating, rather than requiring a total wipe every year or so when an expansion is released. Expansions should, well, actually expand an MMO, not just shift everyone over, but that’s another rant.

First let’s talk itemization. In this game items would wear and break fast, somewhere in the range of 2-3 PvE hunting trips per item/set. Getting an item repaired would slow this process some, but only temporarily. Consider games like EVE or DF, where when you go out to PvP, you more or less expect to lose what you bring, and if you don’t it’s a bonus. As this is a PvE game, you don’t expect to die every trip (but more often than when PvE’ing in a themepark), yet the item mentality should be somewhat close. Forget ‘best in slot’ thinking, and replace it with ‘best item for the job’. If you are going out to hunt some easier prey, or travel out into dangerous territory, you bring a cheaper set of gear. It will still get the job done, yet the price of it wearing down or being lost is still below what you will earn while PvE’ing. When you are faced with a do-or-die situation (your house/city being raided by a host of mobs), you bring out the top shelf stuff and hope it’s enough, yet even if you end up losing that, it’s not the end of the world (but does sting).

With gear getting destroyed at such a high rate, it has to be replaced at an equally rapid pace. This is where crafting and, more importantly, selling comes in.

First and foremost the crafting itself would be one-click simple. If you want to play a mini-game, find a mini-game online or get a Wii. Crafting should be more about the economics and supply/demand than who can play a poor mans version of Tetris (or worse) better.

But that does not mean crafting should be instant. To attempt something a bit new (to me at least), I think the initial act of crafting should take 30 seconds or so for the first item, and increasingly more time for subsequent items (a stacking debuff that lasts an hour or so) to represent fatigue. The goal is to allow a crafter to socialize or plan while making a few items that he needs right away, but to prevent someone from chain-crafting 100s of items in a row in just a few minutes. With mobs randomly raiding cities/houses (think random PK raids, but with mobs), going afk to craft would be a bad idea.

Plus you don’t need to do that with the production system. If you own a shop or are part of a crafting guild (more on both tomorrow), you can queue up production similar to what happens in EVE. The production speed would be the reverse of self-crafting; the more you craft, the less time each item takes (mass production efficiency). The goal here is to allow major crafters or crafting teams to mass supply the most common goods (arrows, basic weapons/armor/potions), and to create locations of importance in the world. Guilds will want to protect their production base from roaming mobs or invasions, and players will naturally gravitate together in cities to mutually protect each other. The world would react accordingly, and high-value mob targets would migrate away from major cities, requiring expert PvE hunters to either live out in the wilds or travel longer distances. Major player hubs would also draw the attention of mob warlords looking to raid and pillage player cities, and the bigger a city gets, the more frequent and powerful the raids get.

As for item power, think of it like a Ferrari vs a Toyota. Both get you from point A to point B in basically the same way, with the Ferrari doing it a little faster (if possible), and with some extra comfort. The biggest difference between the two, aside from price, is that the Ferrari is a status symbol and an excessive toy. No one NEEDS a Ferrari to get to work, but at the same time no one would turn it down or complain that they would rather go back to the Toyota. Items should work in a similar fashion. The difference between a basic iron sword and say, a diamond one is somewhat marginal. Yes, the diamond sword does last a little longer and hit a little harder, but we are talking percentage points here rather than orders of magnitude like in most MMOs. The price (determined by availability of materials and crafting difficulty) would be orders of magnitude greater, and so for every diamond sword someone owns, they could have had a few dozen iron ones.

As performance is similar, this means a ‘poor’ player in iron can still group up with someone in higher-end gear and not feel useless, while also always encouraging players to gain more wealth and to try maintaining a certain level of average gear. Those who are able to earn more wealth will, on average, use better gear, but almost all players should have one or two sets of great gear to pull out for big events. From the supply side, this means even the basic items will retain some demand, the mid-tier stuff will need replacing often, and even high-end pieces will be lost or destroyed enough to warrant continued demand. This also means that when you add higher-power items to the game, they don’t instantly turn everything before them into junk.

Another way to increase demand and variety without inflating power is to allow crafters to make purely cosmetic changes to items during the crafting process. For example, an iron sword with a special hilt or blade tint would still hit like an iron sword, but the demand for it might be higher or lower based on the look. We all know that while we chase shinies for power, we are not beyond putting effort in just to get something that looks cool (or for WoWbies, paying $25 for a mount to sparkle).

By adding cosmetic options to items, this also allows crafters to get creative and custom-design items to establish a reputation (you could get crazy and allow customization on, say, a City of Heroes character creator level, tech willing). If you know Bob puts in a ton of time to create some unique looking stuff, you might be more willing to travel to his shop instead of someone else’s, and pay a little premium for that iron sword as well. If Bob also has a really great looking shop (tomorrows post) that displays his wears well, his profits will reflect that.

As the world is always shifting based on player movement, resources would also react. If one area is being mined frequently, it starts to yield fewer materials, along with losing the ability to provide rarer goods. Expert gatherers would be those who not only have the skills to find the best resources, but also the ability to survive the harsher parts of the world and make it out alive with them. A guild PvE trip could be more about reaching a mining shaft for the rare ore than for the beasts inside, with both fighters and gatherers coming along, and the guild crafters turning the spoils into high-tier gear for everyone.

Crafting should be far more than min/maxing the auction house and under-cutting the current listings by a penny every few minutes, and the economy needs to be deeper than hitting the gold cap because you can. If the whole system is rewarding, it becomes its own game, and those who may not be interested in bashing monsters daily will still sign up, log in, and play a pivotal role. The best sandbox is not one that caters perfectly to one type of player, but rather creates a world to house a wide range of interests; mixing all those interests together to ultimately create something great.

Posted in crafting, Housing, MMO design, Random | 34 Comments

Burnouts Anonymous

Posted on April 11, 2011 by SynCaine

Quick break from the PvE Sandbox series to make an observation about Rift, but no worries (you were worried, I could tell), another post in that series is coming soon.

Over a month in and I’m still having a ton of fun with Rift, sitting on the edge of tier 2 expert dungeons and a few (thousand) points away from rank two in PvP. I’m also amused whenever I read something on Massively about the game, or rather, the comments that follow. There is very clearly a large portion of the MMO population that is simply burned out on themeparks, yet at the same time that population only really plays themeparks. From the outside looking in, it’s a pretty comical situation.

From my personal perspective, Rift does enough things different/better than other themeparks to make it feel fresh and enjoyable. Of course, the last themepark I seriously played was over two years ago (WAR, oops), and that was before Darkfall launched. And before WAR I was playing EVE for well over a year, with some LoTRO mixed to play something with Aria. WoW was before that. Prior to WoW I was playing DAoC, AC, and UO. Other titles have come and gone, but really those are the ones that I’ve spent a significant amount of time with. I’d say it’s a pretty solid mix of themeparks and sandbox titles, with both PvE and PvP focuses.

Had I stayed with WoW from 2004 to Rift’s launch, or jumped between WoW/EQ2/LoTRO during that time, perhaps I’d be as upset or worked up about Rift as well. I’m sure some of the things I’m finding interesting in Rift now are somewhat familiar territory to themepark regulars, and the number of truly unique features Rift sports might indeed be short. If you already hate themeparks (but can’t admit it to yourself), that short list won’t be the cure.

If every dungeon or encounter reminds you of something else, I think that might say more about your gaming history than the game itself. Let’s be honest here, that are only so many ways to design “don’t stand in the fire”, and when you go off the beaten path and create something unique, most of your playerbase won’t be able to handle it, with you either Blizzard’ing it (30% buff!), removing it (Rift werewolf curse), or the players will slowly learn to skip it if the reward is not super-shiny. Skipped content is poor content.

Going back to that burned out playerbase, the sad truth is options do exist for them, whether it be EVE, DF, Fallen Earth, or other titles, but what those games offer is not what these players are actually looking for. Oh, they will tell you it is, just with more polish, or more/less PvP, or just a UI like WoW, or countless other excuses, but for most the honest answer is they just want WoW, but they want it to also feel as fresh as it did for them in 2004. It’s an abomination of the rose-tinted glasses theory in a way, only with a game that is still current rather than something that has truly passed (unless you are playing on the EQ1 progressive server anyway).

It’s also an impossible situation from a dev’s perspective. If you give them what they actually want, you make Rift. If you give them what they say they want, you make Darkfall. The burnouts don’t want either title. They want a revolutionary themepark that feels comfortably familiar. Oh, and can it run on a toaster maxed out while looking like top-end GCI and handling 100s of players on-screen? For free. Gotta be free.

I’m sure someone is crafting that right now, and it’s due to be announced “soon”. Until then, your anguish will continue to entertain us all.

Posted in Dark Age of Camelot, Darkfall Online, EQ2, EVE Online, Fallen Earth, Lord of the Rings Online, MMO design, Rant, Rift, Ultima Online, Warhammer Online, World of Warcraft | 27 Comments

PvE Sandbox MMO: Combat

Posted on April 7, 2011 by SynCaine

The first area I’m going to tackle for the PvE Sandbox is combat, as I think it’s the glue that holds everything together and really sets the tone for the type of game you are playing. It also fuels other systems, and so I believe it’s a good starting point.

Basically, think Mount and Blade or Darkfall. So no tab-targeting, each swing hits or misses based on where the target is vs a dice roll, and things like momentum, weapon reach, and area hit all come into play. I’d also add friendly fire (controlled to prevent griefing, so only when facing mobs and other restrictions), as this really helps control zerging (somewhat anyway) and curbs other cheap tactics.

One goal would be to keep the number of key presses needed to a minimum, so combat comes down to who has better tactics and reactions rather than who has configured their UI to account for the 20+ actions needed. To this end I would remove magic as it’s seen in most MMOs, but not to the extent that M&B does. Basically the world still has some magic to it (floating platforms, monsters, teleports, some kind of healing, etc), but the players themselves can’t throw fireballs or toss out dozens of buffs. Special NPCs could, be they friendly or not.

Since the game is a PvE game, monsters would have decent enough AI that they would drop back, dodge, and use cover. Nothing mind-blowing, but above the usually “run into your sword” charge that common MMO mobs do. Lots of other areas have evolved in MMOs since 97, it’s time for AI to do so as well. The point is to make each encounter challenging enough that you have to focus and react, but also simple enough that every fight does not become a raid boss effort. The more special the encounter, the mob would not only have increased stats, but also increased AI, rather than having a more elaborate script of abilities.

Ranged combat would be limited to things like bows, crossbows, and throwing weapons, and ammo would not be unlimited. The cost of basic ammo would be low, but players would be more limited by how much they can carry and when they are able to resupply. Ideally if you and some buddies are out hunting mobs, you would save up your ranged ammo for special occasions (getting an advantage on a tougher encounter, for instance), and use melee for common stuff. The crafting/itemization post will cover this in greater detail, but basically all items would suffer wear and tear in the game, and eventually everything breaks, so what you bring out is always a consideration rather than an assumed “use the best in slot you have” type of deal.

As for combat goals, the world would be such that player hubs are all friendly to each other (or at least non-combative), and all players fight against a common enemy faction. This factions goal would be, of course, world domination, and player actions would determine just how close that faction is to its goal. As the world would ideally be larger than what the player population could occupy, the enemy faction would be in control of different areas at different times, based mostly on where the current player population has chosen to establish itself (more on this in a different post about housing/cities).

Posted in MMO design, Random | 20 Comments